2019-03-18 19:42:18 +01:00
|
|
|
# Design Notes
|
2019-03-17 18:43:12 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-08-18 04:28:15 +02:00
|
|
|
This file is meant to document design decisions and algorithms inside Vimwiki
|
2019-03-17 18:43:12 +01:00
|
|
|
which are too large for code comments, and not necessarily interesting to
|
|
|
|
users. Please create a new section to document each behavior.
|
2019-03-18 14:02:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2019-03-18 19:42:18 +01:00
|
|
|
## Formatting tables
|
2019-03-18 14:02:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-08-18 04:28:15 +02:00
|
|
|
In Vimwiki, formatting tables occurs dynamically, when navigating between cells
|
2019-03-18 14:02:52 +01:00
|
|
|
and adding new rows in a table in the Insert mode, or statically, when pressing
|
|
|
|
`gqq` or `gqw` (which are mappings for commands `VimwikiTableAlignQ` and
|
|
|
|
`VimwikiTableAlignW` respectively) in the Normal mode. It also triggers when
|
|
|
|
leaving Insert mode, provided variable `g:vimwiki_table_auto_fmt` is set. In
|
|
|
|
this section, the original and the newer optimized algorithms of table
|
|
|
|
formatting will be described and compared.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-03-18 19:42:18 +01:00
|
|
|
### The older table formatting algorithm and why this is not optimal
|
2019-03-18 14:02:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let's consider a simple example. Open a new file, say _tmp.wiki_, and create a
|
|
|
|
new table with command `VimwikiTable`. This should create a blank table.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-03-18 19:42:18 +01:00
|
|
|
```
|
2019-03-18 14:02:52 +01:00
|
|
|
| | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | |
|
2019-03-18 19:42:18 +01:00
|
|
|
```
|
2019-03-18 14:02:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let's put the cursor in the first header column of the table, enter the Insert
|
|
|
|
mode and type a name, say _Col1_. Then press _Tab_: the cursor will move to the
|
|
|
|
second column of the header and the table will get aligned (in the context of
|
|
|
|
the table formatting story, words _aligned_ and _formatted_ are considered as
|
|
|
|
synonyms). Now the table looks as in the following snippet.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-03-18 19:42:18 +01:00
|
|
|
```
|
2019-03-18 14:02:52 +01:00
|
|
|
| Col1 | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|------|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | |
|
2019-03-18 19:42:18 +01:00
|
|
|
```
|
2019-03-18 14:02:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then, when moving cursor to the first data row (i.e. to the third line of the
|
|
|
|
table below the separator line) and typing anything here and there while
|
|
|
|
navigating using _Tab_ or _Enter_ (pressing this creates a new row below the
|
|
|
|
current row), the table shall keep formatting. Below is a result of such a
|
|
|
|
random edit.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-03-18 19:42:18 +01:00
|
|
|
```
|
2019-03-18 14:02:52 +01:00
|
|
|
| Col1 | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|------|-------|---|-------|----------|
|
|
|
|
| | Data1 | | Data2 | |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | New data |
|
2019-03-18 19:42:18 +01:00
|
|
|
```
|
2019-03-18 14:02:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The lowest row gets aligned when leaving the Insert mode. Let's copy _Data1_
|
|
|
|
(using `viwy` or another keystroke) and paste it (using `p`) in the second data
|
|
|
|
row of the first column. Now the table looks mis-aligned (as we did not enter
|
|
|
|
the Insert mode).
|
|
|
|
|
2019-03-18 19:42:18 +01:00
|
|
|
```
|
2019-03-18 14:02:52 +01:00
|
|
|
| Col1 | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|------|-------|---|-------|----------|
|
|
|
|
| | Data1 | | Data2 | |
|
|
|
|
| Data1 | | | | New data |
|
2019-03-18 19:42:18 +01:00
|
|
|
```
|
2019-03-18 14:02:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is not a big problem though, because we can put the cursor at _any_ place
|
|
|
|
in the table and press `gqq`: the table will get aligned.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-03-18 19:42:18 +01:00
|
|
|
```
|
2019-03-18 14:02:52 +01:00
|
|
|
| Col1 | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|-------|-------|---|-------|----------|
|
|
|
|
| | Data1 | | Data2 | |
|
|
|
|
| Data1 | | | | New data |
|
2019-03-18 19:42:18 +01:00
|
|
|
```
|
2019-03-18 14:02:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now let's make real problems! Move the cursor to the lowest row and copy it
|
|
|
|
with `yy`. Then 500-fold paste it with `500p`. Now the table very long. Move
|
|
|
|
the cursor to the lowest row (by pressing `G`), enter the Insert mode, and try
|
|
|
|
a new random editing session by typing anything in cells with _Tab_ and _Enter_
|
|
|
|
navigation interleaves. The editing got painfully slow, did not?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reason of the slowing down is the older table formatting algorithm. Every
|
|
|
|
time _Tab_ or _Enter_ get pressed down, all rows in the table get visited to
|
|
|
|
calculate a new alignment. Moreover, by design it may happen even more than
|
|
|
|
once per one press!
|
|
|
|
|
2019-03-18 19:42:18 +01:00
|
|
|
```vim
|
2019-03-18 14:02:52 +01:00
|
|
|
function! s:kbd_create_new_row(cols, goto_first)
|
|
|
|
let cmd = "\<ESC>o".s:create_empty_row(a:cols)
|
|
|
|
let cmd .= "\<ESC>:call vimwiki#tbl#format(line('.'))\<CR>"
|
|
|
|
let cmd .= "\<ESC>0"
|
|
|
|
if a:goto_first
|
|
|
|
let cmd .= ":call search('\\(".s:rxSep()."\\)\\zs', 'c', line('.'))\<CR>"
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
let cmd .= (col('.')-1)."l"
|
|
|
|
let cmd .= ":call search('\\(".s:rxSep()."\\)\\zs', 'bc', line('.'))\<CR>"
|
|
|
|
endif
|
|
|
|
let cmd .= "a"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return cmd
|
|
|
|
endfunction
|
2019-03-18 19:42:18 +01:00
|
|
|
```
|
2019-03-18 14:02:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Function `s:kbd_create_new_row()` is called when _Tab_ or _Enter_ get pressed.
|
|
|
|
Formatting of the whole table happens in function `vimwiki#tbl#format()`. But
|
|
|
|
remember that leaving the Insert mode triggers re-formatting of a table when
|
|
|
|
variable `g:vimwiki_table_auto_fmt` is set. This means that formatting of the
|
|
|
|
whole table is called on all those multiple interleaves between the Insert and
|
|
|
|
the Normal mode in `s:kbd_create_new_row` (notice `\<ESC>`, `o`, etc.).
|
|
|
|
|
2020-08-18 04:28:15 +02:00
|
|
|
### The newer table formatting algorithm
|
2019-03-18 14:02:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The newer algorithm was introduced to struggle against performance issues when
|
|
|
|
formatting large tables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let's take the table from the previous example in an intermediate state.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-03-18 19:42:18 +01:00
|
|
|
```
|
2019-03-18 14:02:52 +01:00
|
|
|
| Col1 | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|------|-------|---|-------|----------|
|
|
|
|
| | Data1 | | Data2 | |
|
|
|
|
| Data1 | | | | New data |
|
2019-03-18 19:42:18 +01:00
|
|
|
```
|
2019-03-18 14:02:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then move the cursor to the first data row, copy it with `yy`, go down to the
|
|
|
|
mis-aligned line, and press `5p`. Now we have a slightly bigger mis-aligned
|
|
|
|
table.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-03-18 19:42:18 +01:00
|
|
|
```
|
2019-03-18 14:02:52 +01:00
|
|
|
| Col1 | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|------|-------|---|-------|----------|
|
|
|
|
| | Data1 | | Data2 | |
|
|
|
|
| Data1 | | | | New data |
|
|
|
|
| | Data1 | | Data2 | |
|
|
|
|
| | Data1 | | Data2 | |
|
|
|
|
| | Data1 | | Data2 | |
|
|
|
|
| | Data1 | | Data2 | |
|
|
|
|
| | Data1 | | Data2 | |
|
2019-03-18 19:42:18 +01:00
|
|
|
```
|
2019-03-18 14:02:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Go down to the lowest, the 7th, data row and press `gq1`. Nothing happened.
|
|
|
|
Let's go to the second or the third data row and press `gq1` once again. Now
|
|
|
|
the table gets aligned. Let's undo formatting with `u`, go to the fourth row,
|
|
|
|
and press `gq1`. Now the table should look like in the following snippet.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-03-18 19:42:18 +01:00
|
|
|
```
|
2019-03-18 14:02:52 +01:00
|
|
|
| Col1 | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|------|-------|---|-------|----------|
|
|
|
|
| | Data1 | | Data2 | |
|
|
|
|
| Data1 | | | | New data |
|
|
|
|
| | Data1 | | Data2 | |
|
|
|
|
| | Data1 | | Data2 | |
|
|
|
|
| | Data1 | | Data2 | |
|
|
|
|
| | Data1 | | Data2 | |
|
|
|
|
| | Data1 | | Data2 | |
|
2019-03-18 19:42:18 +01:00
|
|
|
```
|
2019-03-18 14:02:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What a peculiar command! Does using it make any sense? Not much, honestly.
|
|
|
|
Except it shows how the newer optimized table formatting algorithm works in the
|
|
|
|
Insert mode.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed, the newer table formatting algorithm introduces a _viewport_ on a table.
|
|
|
|
Now, when pressing _Tab_ or _Enter_ in the Insert mode, only a small part of
|
|
|
|
rows are checked for possible formatting: two rows above the current line and
|
|
|
|
the current line itself (the latter gets preliminary shrunk with function
|
|
|
|
`s:fmt_row()`). If all three lines in the viewport are of the same length, then
|
|
|
|
nothing happens (case 1 in the example). If the second or the shrunk current
|
|
|
|
line is longer then the topmost line in the viewport, then the algorithm falls
|
|
|
|
back to the older formatting algorithm and the whole table gets aligned
|
|
|
|
(case 2). If the topmost line in the viewport is longer than the second
|
|
|
|
and the shrunk current line, then the two lowest lines get aligned according to
|
|
|
|
the topmost line (case 3).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance of the newer formatting algorithm should not depend on the height
|
2019-03-18 15:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
of the table. The newer algorithm should also be consistent with respect to
|
|
|
|
user editing experience. Indeed, as soon as a table should normally be edited
|
|
|
|
row by row from the top to the bottom, dynamic formatting should be both fast
|
2019-03-18 14:02:52 +01:00
|
|
|
(watching only three rows in a table, re-formatting only when the shrunk
|
|
|
|
current row gets longer than any of the two rows above) and eager (a table
|
2019-03-18 15:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
should look formatted on every press on _Tab_ and _Enter_). However, the newer
|
|
|
|
algorithm differs from the older algorithm when starting editing a mis-aligned
|
|
|
|
table in an area where mis-aligned rows do not get into the viewport: in this
|
|
|
|
case the newer algorithm will format the table partly (in the rows of the
|
|
|
|
viewport) until one of the being edited cells grows in length to a value big
|
|
|
|
enough to trigger the older algorithm and the whole table gets aligned. When
|
|
|
|
partial formatting is not desirable, the whole table can be formatted by
|
|
|
|
pressing `gqq` in the Normal mode.
|
2020-08-18 04:28:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Scoped Variable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vimwiki's variables have a scope. They can be:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Global [ex: `global_ext`]
|
|
|
|
2. Wikilocal (1, 2, 3 ...) [ex: `path`]
|
|
|
|
3. Syntaxlocal (default, markdown, media) [ex: `bullet_types`]
|
|
|
|
4. Bufferlocal [ex: `b:vimwiki_wiki_nr`]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
They all can be configured, changed by user
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a comparison, Vim's variables also have a scope (`:h variable-scope`) and
|
|
|
|
can also be configured by users.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While features kept stacking, it became more and more difficult to maintain the
|
|
|
|
coherence and configurability between these variables: a type of markers, say
|
|
|
|
`bullet_types`, can affect folding, highlighting, keystrokes mapping, indentation.
|
|
|
|
All of those aspects often requires internal variables that should be calculated
|
|
|
|
only once's when user is changing the variable and affect only the scope in which
|
|
|
|
they are defined: a `markdown` syntax configuration should affect all `markdown`
|
|
|
|
wikis but not `default` ones. So it was decided (#894) to keep a 3 global
|
|
|
|
dictionaries to hold internal variables (there is only one bufferlocal variable
|
|
|
|
so a dictionary was clearly overkill) and 3 other dictionaries for user
|
|
|
|
configuration. The internal dictionaries get updated at startup (`:h extend`)
|
|
|
|
with the user content but do not modify it. They can also be updated later with
|
|
|
|
`VimwikiVar` function.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here, `key` is the variable name, `2` the wiki number and `markdown` the syntax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```vim
|
|
|
|
" External -> Internal
|
|
|
|
g:vimwiki_{key} -> g:vimwiki_global_vars[key]
|
|
|
|
g:vimwiki_syntax_list['markdown'][key]
|
|
|
|
-> g:vimwiki_syntaxlocal_vars['markdown'][key]
|
|
|
|
g:vimwiki_list[2][key] -> g:vimwiki_wikilocal_vars[2][key]
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All are defined in `vars.vim` and in case of a conflict while executing it, the
|
|
|
|
innermost scope if privileged (as usual for variable scoping conflicts). The
|
|
|
|
reasons for such a complex system is:
|
|
|
|
1. The diversity of variables and developers
|
|
|
|
2. The nature of new (2020) issues asking for some deep customisation (ex: of
|
|
|
|
the link format) or high functionality (ex: on demand wiki creation and
|
|
|
|
configuration)
|
|
|
|
3. Historical excuses that Vimwiki was not designed to be highly configurable at
|
|
|
|
beginning and many temporary internal variables where created to "fix some
|
|
|
|
holes"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- vim: set tw=80: -->
|